It is
surely to be regarded as an advantage that rating and commenting the service
has a positive effect on the clientele. Customers will be informed about the
possible dangers and traps and it also gives escorts the opportunity to change
something in their attitude or the way they treat clients to promote
sex-business. Not all of them, but I think there are some who do not mind bad
reviews as they can learn from their mistakes. Every client’s demand cannot be
satisfied but escorts should strive for doing their best.
I
have not talked much about clients so far but it is to be mentioned that if we
have talked about problematic escorts, let's talk about problematic customers
as well. Yes, there is a kind of customer for whom nothing is good, whose
requirement cannot ever met by any escort. These customers are likely to give
negative reviews.
A
very important thing cannot be left unmentioned. Sociology has developed a
method in order that the collected statistical numbers should be
representative. So it is a criterion that at least two thousand subject have to
be questioned. Those questioned can be identified as users or clients. Here the
doubt arise that 10-15 reviews are enough to draw proper conclusion or they are
just useless information? Another
question is to what extent reviews can be manipulated or faked. What if an
escort made negative comments for one of her colleagues on revenge, in
contrast, good reviews for herself? In addition, there are also the so-called
escort agencies that can produce good comments for its own employees to help
the sex-business.
Of
course, the procedure how to live comments depends on the system of escort
sites or whether it is possible to filter those malevolent reviews that are
intended to make harm for an escort. It is also a question how much attention
the operators of the site pay to moderation. We cannot see, of course, how it
works at different sites, but in any case we could conclude from the text of
the review whether it comes from a client or somebody else such as the employer
site or the escort herself. These fake reviews are usually either too good to
be true, oversophisticated praises or weak text with poor vocabulary and a lot
of grammatical mistakes.
We
all know it is not possible to persuade everyone to assess escort girls by
writing reviews. In my experience, extremism prevails when giving opinion,
which means that a review is written either when the escort is very good or she
is very bad at the service she does. Review in the middle is very rare.
In
conclusion, I would say that all opinions are important to me, but I am a bit
conservative about them. The majority’s opinion is worth listening to, but a
review after all will be born from two different personalities’ togetherness or
clash. They will either get on well or dislike each other. At any rate, we
should listen to the law of large numbers even if it is not always
representative. As I wrote, who is criticised in almost all reviews, there must
be some miscue about her. Finally, built on what I discussed in this article,
it is highly advisable to help each other by making acquaintances or organizing
into customer groups to share information or just write reviews on escort
sites, being sure what we write corresponds with reality.